 |
|
|
I just updated the other links
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you can find a copy of .NET reflector version 6 and not version 7, that is free and the updating built into that will not take you up to version 7. I just updated one on my machine and it took me up to 6.8. The nice thing with .NET Reflecter is that there are plugins for it to allow you to create the full project files and save the source code out.
Steve Maier
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steve Maier wrote: The nice thing with .NET Reflecter is that there are plugins for it to allow you to create the full project files and save the source code out.
Reflector will be richer given how long it's been around. JustDeompile also has built-in project creation support, as does ILSpy. I tried the project creation on a simple utility assembly of mine and it built without error, though they say it's not guaranteed to.
Kevin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I do like JustDecompile. But I had a WPF based app that it failed to create the project.
Steve Maier
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nice 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'll take a look. I've been using JetBrains dotPeek for a while and found it to be quite excellent.
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair.
nils illegitimus carborundum
me, me, me
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'd completely forgotten about this forum and instead posted here[^]  . It's now fully released. I've given it a spin. Seems OK. I guess that .NET Reflector is going to be ahead of the free ones for a while at least.
Kevin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I want to looking for free software to connecting SSH or Telnet
except putty
(free for not only personal but also commecial)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why not putty? It's probably the best available.
Unrequited desire is character building. OriginalGriff
I'm sitting here giving you a standing ovation - Len Goodman
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Putty is awesome, as is Open SSH[^].
Something worth reading, albeit it's invincible!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
http://perspectives.codeplex.com/[^]
What does it do: Saves and restores your window layouts
Why do I like it: Because I hate the faffing about trying to get my windows back where they belong when I accidentally drag them out of position.
It's nice to be able to put your toolbox, properties pane, solution + server explorer, error list, output window and all the others in specific places, but it can be a pain to remember the order in which you have to move them in order to get the "ideal" layout for you. And when I have got it, then accidentally drag and drop the properties pane into the editing window I have to move loads of stuff before I get it back. Perspectives allows you to save and load your window settings when you want - so you can have one setting for your laptop as a mobile unit, and another when it is docked to your quad monitor setup. And it'll let you do it with a toolbar button.
Yes, yes, I know you can do it via the "Import and Export Settings Wizard" on the Tools menu, then unchecking everything except the "Window Layouts" under the "General" settings list, but I can never remember that lot!
[edit]Forgot the download link -OriginalGriff[/edit]
[edit2]Extra "N" in Studio -OriginalGriff[/edit2]
Ideological Purity is no substitute for being able to stick your thumb down a pipe to stop the water
modified 3 Feb '12.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wonde Tadesse
MCTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Never heard of Visual StudioN edition, has that had some features removed like Windows 7 N?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes - the spelling checker!
Ideological Purity is no substitute for being able to stick your thumb down a pipe to stop the water
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dear all,
I start working in my current company not long ago. This is a small company and does not have any version control software. All projects are small and there is no centralized version control. Or put it this way, there is no need.
I would like to at least version control projects in my machine. My computer is Windows 7 64 bit Home Premium edition. I need to have a GUI to check out and check in files. Beside checking in and out source code, I will check in documents.
I don't mind installing one software and install the 'front end' afterward. Any recommendation?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I use SVN (Subversion)... it's very good and there's a ton of information about it out there (and a lot of clients to choose from for accessing your repositories). A lot people though are choosing distributed repository systems such as Mercurial. I would say find something that fits what you need from the popular ones (since they'll have the most wide support) and try it out, if you like it, keep going with it... if not, try something else.
...and the whole idea that a small company doesn't need version control is well... not very good at all...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Albert Holguin wrote: the whole idea that a small company doesn't need version control is well... not very good at all
Absolutely.
I am self employed, and I use SVN. Source control is an excellent tool, provided you A) remember to use it, B) only ever check in working, tested code, and C) don't try to use it as an alternative to backups.
Ideological Purity is no substitute for being able to stick your thumb down a pipe to stop the water
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well...
A) Should be easy if you use something like Tortoise to interface with the SVN server... since the icons or the folders and files are changed (red "X"s mark the changed docs).
B) No need to... if you know how to use branches, revert changes, and use diffs. Given you've adopted the Trunk/Branches/Tags methodology (which is not forced on you), you can have one of the branches be your personally working copy, and have the Trunk be your main source.
C) Well, it could complimentary. For example, when using SVN, the initial checkout will take a while (on big projects) but after that, it only downloads changes. So you can use it to keep a remote backup updated without using much bandwidth at all (and it's really fast).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'd reccomend getting VisualSVNServer[^] to act as your subversion server, and then use tortoiseSVN[^] on your client machine(s)
if you are using Visual studio then I would also recommend AnkhSVN[^]
All free, minimal fuss and easy set up
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are lots of free version control systems available and to be honest the choice between them usually boils down to personal taste. You don't say what development environment you are using (.NET, Java, Python, PHP, something weird and off the shelf) but I don't think that matters.
Subversion is good, mainstream, easy to use (once you get used to it), and has plugins to integrate it with just about any IDE you can think of, and tortoiseSVN is a good GUI for it that integrates well with Windows Explorer.
Flavour of the month are tools like Mercurial, Git, DARCS or Bazaar. I don't think DARCS has a GUI available, the others do. Bazaar is popular in the Python world, Mercurial is the trendy VCS to use in Java circles, and Git is the sweetheart of the open source world at the moment. But all of them work well with any language and with binary files like documents or images.
And to echo what others here have said: the idea that a small company does not need version control is wrong, wrong, wrong. Lack of proper version control just screams "amateur" and tells me that their development procedures are likely to be pretty sloppy in general. So well done for deciding to use your own.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
Thanks for the information. As I am in a small company, beside the computer I am given and certain key software, I don't expect the company will pay for version control software.
So I will pick up Subversion and use TortoiseSVN for the front end. I hope there is not much in learning to use those.
Well thanks for the praise that I decide to use version control software in this company. Hey even almost all projects are small, the rate of reuse previous software is high. It is becoming a must to use version control software.
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Rant 
Admin